Comments on: Nikon D3x Preview by What Digital Camera magazine

By: eakiboz

eakiboz — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 06:39:25 +0000

ppl keep talking about MP`s !!! you dont need more than 10 or 12 unless you gonna print huge pic`s !!! alot of MP dosnt make you a better photographer, its how you take pic`s , i rather spend some money on good glass befor a new body

By: harussherlan

harussherlan — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:10:08 +0000

Since I’m not an Elnglish speaker, I cannot understand the full contents of this preview. Can someonw help me please? Thank you very much.

By: shane6003PQ

shane6003PQ — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:28:19 +0000

leica mp?(the name of a leica special al a cart rangefinder) lol jk, I to a certain extent agree with you. but when it gets to larger formats, it’s necessary to have larger megapixel quantities.

By: eakiboz

eakiboz — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:37:51 +0000

well when it gets to larger formats you will need some thing with High MP !!! i agree with you on that

By: AIDSbanana

AIDSbanana — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:40:05 +0000

first you’ll need to tell us what your native language is…

By: animeLo

animeLo — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:41:16 +0000

i think he didnt understand you

By: jesoby

jesoby — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:52:23 +0000

should sell like hot cakes in the credit crunch

By: RandomLogic1968

RandomLogic1968 — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:51:23 +0000

Although I’m like everyone else, and the thought of owning a D3x makes me salivate, I’m not sure one could justify the purchase of such a rig unless:
1. You’re an art photographer working on a grand scale.
2. You’re in advertising, and wanna make a freaking billboard.
If your into photojournalism or wildlife photography in one form or another, the D700 (and yes, perhaps the D3 *rolls eyes*) should suit you just fine.
Personally, I’m a D300 guy. It’s a great rig for 80% of us out there.

By: biged2226

biged2226 — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:27:12 +0000

Huge fan of Nikon. Been shooting with Nikon’s since I was 14 years old but I can’t seem to understand why they feel the need to **** consumers with these outrages prices. I own a D300 and look to buy a D3 soon. They should implement some sort of discounts for those of us who have been loyal to nikon. 20 years of nikon product, I have probabbly shelled out over 10,000 bucks. In a nutshell, cut cost of products or consumers will find other brands. D3x=overrated

By: someguy6481

someguy6481 — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:28:13 +0000

I agree with you biged2226

£5000 for a camera?!!! that’s extortion, I don’t care what else it does. You’re better off with the d700, d3, Sony a900 or that godforsaken, “error 99″ infested Canon 5d Mark II. The D300 is beautiful camera by the way, best cropped framed sensor camera on the market, Nikon out did Canon & themselves with the D300 & I can’t think how Nikon will improve on something that is simply awesome. Perhaps a faster fps in burst mode without a grip.

By: BigDickDerrick

BigDickDerrick — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:37:59 +0000

If your not retarded you could check on his profile

By: likeawhispr

likeawhispr — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:29:43 +0000

The only product on the market right now that competes with the D3x is the Canon 1dsIII, and it only sells for 1k less. So much for everyone’s price rant. The D3x isn’t badly priced for the target market. Non standard Sony isn’t a contender (non standard flash shoe? Is Sony crazy? Pure rubbish!. The Canon 5dII is excellent, but slow- I can’t see myself shooting a baseball game with the 5dII and 600mm lens in a light rain can you? .. of course not. Nikon did not miss the mark.

By: someguy6481

someguy6481 — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:52:43 +0000

well not every body is part of that “target market”, it wouldn’t surprise me if Nikon release a D700x (or what ever) in order to compete with Sony & Canon, In regards to the 5d Mark II I have seen sport shots taken with the 5d Mark II on Pbase & flickr, but the 5D Mark II is designed for fashion & landscape. But I stand by my statement that the d3x is extremely expensive.

By: someguy6481

someguy6481 — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:41:33 +0000

FYI according to Ken Rockwell, the d700x is on its way.

By: lonelykatana

lonelykatana — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:35:57 +0000

I’m not sure why anyone would need such a high pixel count, other than the obvious use for tight cropping.
The D300 can surly suit everyones needs.
I mean hell, even billboard can be printed from about 10mp. Even if they do look crappy close up!

Inform me please?

By: dewtt

dewtt — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:29:23 +0000

fit camra i love this

By: rustynasty143

rustynasty143 — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:24:07 +0000

Double the resolution triple the price and not as good as the d3 performance or 1ds mark 3 performance. The only advantage the d3x has is the resolution but to think of it not that many photographers want a high resolution or higher price like the d3x.

By: T2191J

T2191J — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:30:52 +0000

only reason someone would need it is if they were a professional photographer, or had enough money that they can buy whatever they want regardless of the price…nikon makes an awesome camera tho!

By: sory144

sory144 — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:08:14 +0000

it`s big…

By: UNITED4LIIFE

UNITED4LIIFE — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:23:55 +0000

its all to do with what lens you buy