Comments on: nikon camera lens do i really need to pay more for Vibration Reduction? http://www.weddingeventphotography.com/2009/nikon-camera-lens-do-i-really-need-to-pay-more-for-vibration-reduction/ Photographers and Special Events Thu, 9 Feb 2012 01:07:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Juldog http://www.weddingeventphotography.com/2009/nikon-camera-lens-do-i-really-need-to-pay-more-for-vibration-reduction/#comment-849 Juldog Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:03:40 +0000 http://www.weddingeventphotography.com/2009/nikon-camera-lens-do-i-really-need-to-pay-more-for-vibration-reduction/#comment-849 If you are just starting out in photography, the VR option really is useful. When I first started with my Nikon, I couldn't get clear photos in low light with a low shutter speed. I regretted not getting the VR lens. However, now that I have more experience and practice, I have adjusted and feel as though it's not imperative for good photos. My advise: if it's the first camera and lens you are getting, opt for the VR option. It will make a difference and take some frustration out of taking pics. If you've been taking pictures for a while, and can hold your camera steady or have a tripod, you shouldn't need to pay extra for the VR. Photogs from the past didn't need it! :) If you are just starting out in photography, the VR option really is useful. When I first started with my Nikon, I couldn’t get clear photos in low light with a low shutter speed. I regretted not getting the VR lens. However, now that I have more experience and practice, I have adjusted and feel as though it’s not imperative for good photos.

My advise: if it’s the first camera and lens you are getting, opt for the VR option. It will make a difference and take some frustration out of taking pics. If you’ve been taking pictures for a while, and can hold your camera steady or have a tripod, you shouldn’t need to pay extra for the VR. Photogs from the past didn’t need it! :)

]]> By: Jt C http://www.weddingeventphotography.com/2009/nikon-camera-lens-do-i-really-need-to-pay-more-for-vibration-reduction/#comment-848 Jt C Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:04:29 +0000 http://www.weddingeventphotography.com/2009/nikon-camera-lens-do-i-really-need-to-pay-more-for-vibration-reduction/#comment-848 Vr is a fairly new innovation on cameras ( in the large scheme that is ). So no you don't. VR will let you use a slower shutter speed handheld with the same length lens. If you are not using VR use the reciprocal of the lens focal length as your slowest handheld speed ( eg 200 mm lens 1/250 sec slowest shutter speed) or use a tripod or monopod when you are slower. Vr is a fairly new innovation on cameras ( in the large scheme that is ). So no you don’t. VR will let you use a slower shutter speed handheld with the same length lens. If you are not using VR use the reciprocal of the lens focal length as your slowest handheld speed ( eg 200 mm lens 1/250 sec slowest shutter speed) or use a tripod or monopod when you are slower.

]]> By: fhotoace http://www.weddingeventphotography.com/2009/nikon-camera-lens-do-i-really-need-to-pay-more-for-vibration-reduction/#comment-847 fhotoace Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:14:16 +0000 http://www.weddingeventphotography.com/2009/nikon-camera-lens-do-i-really-need-to-pay-more-for-vibration-reduction/#comment-847 No, unless then lens you want only comes in the VR model. The best VR or IS compensation is done in the lens ... any other scheme is a compromise. Actually the 55-200 mm VR lens is not that much ... $200. Actually the VR version of the 400 mm f/2.8 and 600 mm f/4 cost less than the non-VR versions. The perception is the customer is paying more for this feature. Probably not. They are just part of the design of certain lenses. No, unless then lens you want only comes in the VR model.

The best VR or IS compensation is done in the lens … any other scheme is a compromise. Actually the 55-200 mm VR lens is not that much … $200. Actually the VR version of the 400 mm f/2.8 and 600 mm f/4 cost less than the non-VR versions. The perception is the customer is paying more for this feature. Probably not. They are just part of the design of certain lenses.

]]> By: mislanaday http://www.weddingeventphotography.com/2009/nikon-camera-lens-do-i-really-need-to-pay-more-for-vibration-reduction/#comment-846 mislanaday Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:07:40 +0000 http://www.weddingeventphotography.com/2009/nikon-camera-lens-do-i-really-need-to-pay-more-for-vibration-reduction/#comment-846 Depends on the lens. It's very handy on your standard primary and budget zoom. If you use both/either as your general walk around lenses the VR is a real bonus. You can do without, BUT it's useful if you're the sort that likes to take his camera everywhere and likes to shoot alot. However, higher end non VR lenses produce sharper images than many VR lenses. Better glass, faster focusing, etc. Though for a walk around lens VR is highly recommended. Depends on the lens.
It’s very handy on your standard primary and budget zoom. If you use both/either as your general walk around lenses the VR is a real bonus. You can do without, BUT it’s useful if you’re the sort that likes to take his camera everywhere and likes to shoot alot.

However, higher end non VR lenses produce sharper images than many VR lenses. Better glass, faster focusing, etc.
Though for a walk around lens VR is highly recommended.

]]>